NewJeans sent a notice to ADOR demanding rectification of contract violations or face termination of their contract.
November/14/2024 14:32
NewJeans sent a certified letter to ADOR stating, 'If you do not accept the rectification request, we will terminate the exclusive contract.' In response, ADOR commented today (14th), 'First, regarding the certified letter, we received it this morning and are currently reviewing it, and we are aware of the specific requests. We intend to do our best to resolve this wisely and continue to work with the artists.' They added, 'Regarding inquiries related to a certain listed company, Min Hee-jin has conveyed that there is no basis for claims regarding whether NewJeans members' relatives are involved or whether she has contacted the relevant company.' Prior to this, on the 13th, NewJeans sent a certified letter to ADOR under the real names of the five members. They demanded, 'Correct all serious violations of the exclusive contract within 14 days from the date of receipt.' The certified letter sent by NewJeans to ADOR reportedly included an apology for a manager from another group telling Hani to 'ignore' and the return of Min Hee-jin as CEO.
Related Articles
The Korea Music Content Association said the New York Times gave a one-sided view of a K-pop contract dispute, ignoring Korea’s laws, standard contracts, and the industry’s artist-protection system. It defended K-pop’s incubation model and urged fair, balanced judgment.
NewJeans’ Daniel and Hanni were seen at the 2026 Miracle 365 Purme Run charity event in Seoul. Photos showed them posing with participants. The event marked the 10th anniversary of a children’s rehabilitation hospital, and all fees support treatment for disabled children. Their appearance also drew attention amid Daniel’s ongoing dispute with ADOR.
Min Hee-jin issued a detailed rebuttal to HYBE, arguing that HYBE—not ADOR—controlled the drafting and approval of NewJeans’ exclusive contract. She said HYBE’s legal team handled the draft, revisions, and final approvals, while HYBE now unfairly shifts responsibility to its subsidiary.
HYBE rejected a New York Times report on NewJeans’ exclusive contract, saying it included standard youth and human-rights protections, was negotiated over months with members, parents, and lawyers, and that penalty and image-use clauses were not unfairly changed.
NewJeans’ Danielle released a singing video of her new self-written song, “Stay,” on her personal YouTube channel on the 4th anniversary of the fandom Bunnies. The lyrics suggest a changed relationship, and the timing drew interest. She also posted a birthday message to Bunnies.
ADOR also won on appeal in its damages lawsuit against advertising production company Dolphin Kidnapping Group and director Shin Woo-seok. The court upheld that posting the director’s cut of NewJeans’ “ETA” music video without prior written consent breached the contract, even if oral approval had been claimed.
NewJeans’ Danielle posted a Melbourne vlog on her YouTube channel, showing time with her sister Olivia Marsh and outings for croissants, coffee, and ice cream. Fans noticed people and dogs that seemed linked to Hanni, leading to speculation that some friends in the video were NewJeans members. Danielle also showed affection for NewJeans by visiting the Great Ocean Road, posting a Bunnies Camp sticker, and sharing related photos. The text also mentions her ongoing legal dispute with ADOR.
NewJeans’ Hanni marked her birthday by sharing two selfies on the group’s official SNS. The photos showed her in a dreamy, vintage mood, and fans around the world sent birthday wishes and support. Danielle also appeared to celebrate Hanni’s birthday on Instagram.
NewJeans’ Hanni partly won a damages lawsuit against two netizens who posted insulting and defamatory comments about her. A Seoul court ordered each defendant to pay 100,000 won, saying their remarks were abusive and personal attacks. The court also noted Hanni herself had not acted in a socially blameworthy way.
Former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin won a damages lawsuit brought by BELIFT LAB creative director Huh over her 2024 claims that ILLIT copied NewJeans. The court dismissed the claims, saying the evidence did not show Shin, the former ADOR vice president, was involved, and that Huh was not clearly identified as the defamation victim. Huh later abandoned the appeal, making the ruling final and leaving court costs to him.
