NewJeans' Minji and Hani appear on SPUR magazine's January 2025 cover, showcasing their chemistry and fashion from CHANEL and GUCCI.
November/16/2024 10:42
Minji and Hani of NewJeans adorned the cover of the Japanese lifestyle magazine 'SPUR'. On the 15th, 'SPUR' unveiled the cover of the January 2025 issue featuring Minji and Hani together through their official website and social media. This is the first time the two have graced a magazine cover together. In the released cover, despite being a close-up shot, Minji and Hani showcased dazzling visuals. They wore outfits from 'CHANEL' and 'GUCCI', for which they are ambassadors, posing adorably with their faces close together, displaying their chemistry. 'SPUR' noted, 'Their natural interactions, chatting happily on set and closely engaging with the staff, were impressive.' The magazine also mentioned that in their interview, readers can learn about their relationship and shared memories.
Related Articles
The Korea Music Content Association said the New York Times gave a one-sided view of a K-pop contract dispute, ignoring Korea’s laws, standard contracts, and the industry’s artist-protection system. It defended K-pop’s incubation model and urged fair, balanced judgment.
NewJeans’ Daniel and Hanni were seen at the 2026 Miracle 365 Purme Run charity event in Seoul. Photos showed them posing with participants. The event marked the 10th anniversary of a children’s rehabilitation hospital, and all fees support treatment for disabled children. Their appearance also drew attention amid Daniel’s ongoing dispute with ADOR.
Min Hee-jin issued a detailed rebuttal to HYBE, arguing that HYBE—not ADOR—controlled the drafting and approval of NewJeans’ exclusive contract. She said HYBE’s legal team handled the draft, revisions, and final approvals, while HYBE now unfairly shifts responsibility to its subsidiary.
HYBE rejected a New York Times report on NewJeans’ exclusive contract, saying it included standard youth and human-rights protections, was negotiated over months with members, parents, and lawyers, and that penalty and image-use clauses were not unfairly changed.
NewJeans’ Danielle released a singing video of her new self-written song, “Stay,” on her personal YouTube channel on the 4th anniversary of the fandom Bunnies. The lyrics suggest a changed relationship, and the timing drew interest. She also posted a birthday message to Bunnies.
ADOR also won on appeal in its damages lawsuit against advertising production company Dolphin Kidnapping Group and director Shin Woo-seok. The court upheld that posting the director’s cut of NewJeans’ “ETA” music video without prior written consent breached the contract, even if oral approval had been claimed.
NewJeans’ Danielle posted a Melbourne vlog on her YouTube channel, showing time with her sister Olivia Marsh and outings for croissants, coffee, and ice cream. Fans noticed people and dogs that seemed linked to Hanni, leading to speculation that some friends in the video were NewJeans members. Danielle also showed affection for NewJeans by visiting the Great Ocean Road, posting a Bunnies Camp sticker, and sharing related photos. The text also mentions her ongoing legal dispute with ADOR.
NewJeans’ Hanni marked her birthday by sharing two selfies on the group’s official SNS. The photos showed her in a dreamy, vintage mood, and fans around the world sent birthday wishes and support. Danielle also appeared to celebrate Hanni’s birthday on Instagram.
NewJeans’ Hanni partly won a damages lawsuit against two netizens who posted insulting and defamatory comments about her. A Seoul court ordered each defendant to pay 100,000 won, saying their remarks were abusive and personal attacks. The court also noted Hanni herself had not acted in a socially blameworthy way.
Former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin won a damages lawsuit brought by BELIFT LAB creative director Huh over her 2024 claims that ILLIT copied NewJeans. The court dismissed the claims, saying the evidence did not show Shin, the former ADOR vice president, was involved, and that Huh was not clearly identified as the defamation victim. Huh later abandoned the appeal, making the ruling final and leaving court costs to him.
