YUN SEO BIN

"I've been slacking off on X, but now I'm doing work that feels like a subcontractor for a subcontractor in SEO, and I'm receiving ongoing requests! I started studying web development about a year ago, encountered SEO in the summer, and now I've reached a point where I can earn a small amount of money with my new skills! My goals are still far off, but I'll keep working hard little by little in 2026 as well! #Deitra #WEBMARKS"

The translation of the tweet is: "Oh, is that it? Baby V.O.X is the group that had Yoon Eun-hye! #CurrentSingingKing3"

Today's RO was a light finish with two sets of 5x2 Yunkear in Phantom 2 rounds. I want to clear my backlog of games.

The tweet translates to: "By perceiving change as a 'harbinger' and broadening the discussion to the overall change on the web (from SEO to LLMO), we can showcase a higher perspective. This phenomenon, where X's algorithm has shifted from 'follower count (authority)' to 'conversation volume (engagement),' actually has the same structure as what is currently happening in the world of web search (SEO)." x.com/rakua_aisabori…

By the way, Illyun's mist is really good. It creates an oil field on my nose, but the unevenness has disappeared, reducing my stress by 80%. The SSD is more cost-effective than the ones I saw on big camera sites. There’s also a version that’s twice as fast, X10, but if your PC doesn’t support Gen2×2, it will have the transfer speed of X9. So unless you have a high-spec PC, X9 is better.

Here's the translation of the tweet: "I often see topics like this, but in this day and age, relying solely on X for communication is too simplistic. Ultimately, isn't it best to share across multiple platforms? It would be better to have AI write tailored content for each platform like note and X. From the perspective of SEO and AIO, as long as the articles aren't just copied and pasted, it should be fine."

The translation of the tweet is: "And currently, I am active as ORβIT with Kim Yundong, Miyajima Yushin, Osawa Shunya, and Ando Seimei 🙂‍↕️ [X] @official7orbit [TikTok] tiktok.com/@official_orbi… [Official HP] orbit-official.com"

Here’s the translation of the tweet: **** - Create X posts - Write blog/note - Company LPO - Company SEO: 8 articles - Client media articles: 7 - Read 3 books - UTAGE - LP research - Copywriting A new project in collaboration with my wife is starting. To ensure we achieve results for our clients, I will steadily and diligently work on what I can do now.

The tweet translates to: "It seems that the term 'shadow ban' is being rephrased as 'ranking.' The creators that X refers to might have a different definition. It's clearly AI-first. 🔍 Skin color ban, false reports, shadow ban, unblocking methods, freezing, fraud, suggestions, contamination, F5, brainwashing, SEO, support, hiring x.com/zashikiwasabi/…"

The tweet translates to: "I think the optimal solution right now is to 'post the same content on both' note and X. The reason is simple: these two have completely opposite characteristics. ■ Note: The content of the article is written in HTML, making it easy for crawlers to recognize, which is strong for SEO and AI searches. It is a stock-type that continues to be read over time. ■ X: Article pic.x.com/JDovlywUTM"

The reason why attracting attention with the first line raises the overall evaluation is that catching the eye makes people stop for a moment. This increases the likelihood that they will continue reading. → This makes it easier to receive a higher evaluation. This isn't just true for X; the same principle applies to SEO, advertising, and videos. It's likely the same for note as well. All media share the same evaluation criteria.

X (formerly Twitter) announced a contest to award $1 million for the most impactful long-form articles posted on the platform, encouraging users to share longer content. Journalists and marketers are eagerly participating, leading to a reevaluation of the platform as a new space. On the other hand, there seem to be some areas for improvement from an SEO perspective. 😇 x.com/elonmusk/statu…

The translation of the tweet is: "After that, it depends on SEO and the AEO of the article, as well as whether traffic can be generated from other articles. I feel that in the future, depending on the search function, X could potentially take everything from elsewhere."

The tweet translates to: "I'm currently revisiting strategies for X note, SEO, WordPress, and these four areas. Each of them used to have aspects that worked in the past, but now it feels like they've all gone through a major shift in stance. While I was neglecting them, the times have clearly changed. Moving forward, things will accelerate even more, and old knowledge won't be enough to survive. It's a daily learning process."

This is quite serious, but I've started to think that the optimal solution is to publish the same article on both "note" and "X articles." This is because their respective features are mutually complementary. ✅ Features of note: - Strong in SEO and AI search - A stock-type medium that is easy to revisit later - Attracting traffic from social media is gradually becoming more difficult ( ≒